| 2025-01-07 |
Stephanie |
I asked the AO to make a very careful consideration of this Application. It is a front garden tree in a Conservation Area and is thus significant. It is the wrong time if year for judging its health by looking at the volume of leaves it might bear. Part of the Reason for Felling is that it is in poor health with a low leaf volume.
There is also an allegation of causing subsidence made in this application, yet no evidence has been provided, or if it has, it has not been published, to demonstrate that the tree might be causing subsidence.
This allegation reminded me to look at the Joint Mitigation Protocol (JMP), which I believe has been adopted by BCC as the LPA when considering such allegations/claims.
This was with particular regard to the last sentence “building insurers and their agents have agreed that remedial pruning may be considered as an option rather than always asking for tree removal.”
And I think that is only applied when the tree has been shown to be the cause of subsidence, which is the suggestion here but without published evidence to support it.
The JMP. “Its principal aims are to speed up the process of claims handling, decision making and mitigation implementation leading to resolution, while at the same time recognising the value of trees in the built environment and providing local authorities with all the investigative evidence required at the beginning of the process. A timely decision may then be made on what course of action is appropriate in respect of the tree. It represents a considerable achievement, as for the first time, building insurers and their agents have agreed that remedial pruning may be considered as an option rather than always asking for tree removal.”
Position : Objects Comment Submitted
|