Application Details

Council BCC
Reference 25/12147/FB
Address Land Between 125-135 Wootton Road St Anne's Bristol BS4 4AS  
Street View
Ward Brislington East
Proposal Demolition of walls, altered access and construction of 7no. Use Class C3 dwellings with associated refuse and cycle storage. Enhancement of existing landscaped space.
Validated 2025-05-21
Type Full Planning (Regulation 3)
Status Pending consideration
Neighbour Consultation Expiry 2025-06-17
Standard Consultation Expiry 2025-06-17
Determination Deadline 2025-07-16
BCC Planning Portal on Planning Portal
Public Comments Supporters: 0 Objectors: 4  Unstated: 1  Total: 5
No. of Page Views 0
Comment analysis   Date of Submission
Links
Nearby Trees Within 200m

BTF response: OBJECT

 

Here are our comments of 24 May 2025

Public Comments

    on 2025-06-05   OBJECT

Commenter Type: Neighbour

Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application

Comment Reasons:

Comment:I am writing to formally object to the proposed construction of seven flats on the land

While I appreciate the need for new housing, this

particular development raises several serious concerns that I urge you to consider before any

planning consent is granted. The notice posted through my door was the first time I had heard

anything about any plans to build on this land - a consultation ahead of time would've been nice.

1. Environmental Impact and Risk to Property

Between my home and the proposed development lies a strip of undeveloped land that is home to

several large, mature trees. Disturbance to this land could destabilise these trees, posing a real

risk of damage to my property. I have made multiple attempts to contact Bristol City Council (BCC)

to clarify ownership and responsibility for this land and the trees, yet the Council continue to deny

this, yet after contacting my MP I know this is theirs to maintain. This lack of accountability is

deeply troubling and raises doubts over the Council's ability to manage land within its own

portfolio-let alone new developments.

2. Maintenance Concerns

I am concerned about the long-term maintenance of both the proposed building and the

surrounding communal areas. Poorly managed developments can lead to visual and structural

decline, directly impacting the value and quality of neighbouring properties.

3. Loss of Privacy and Overlooking

The proposed flats appear to be positioned on elevated ground compared to other properties in

the row. This creates a serious privacy issue, particularly in the colder months when the trees are

bare and natural screening is reduced. The potential for direct overlooking into my home and

garden is unacceptable and would significantly impact my privacy. As I work from home this is of

great concern for me.

4. Noise and Disruption

The development will bring significant noise and disruption during construction as well as after with

additional residents, which will negatively affect the peaceful enjoyment of my home and garden.

Given the proximity to my property, this will undoubtedly be invasive over a prolonged period.

Given these points, I strongly urge the Council to reconsider or refuse this application unless clear,

enforceable measures can be put in place to address all of the above concerns.

Thank you for your time and attention. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this matter

further and be informed of any developments regarding this proposal.

Yours faithfully,

Not Available    on 2025-06-01   OBJECT

I am writing in response to the letter we received this week regarding the proposeddevelopment of new flats on our road. I would like to raise several serious concerns on behalf ofmyself and other members of the community.

Firstly, the correspondence did not specify a clear timeframe for responses, which has causedconfusion and uncertainty. Additionally, it appears that previous feedback from residents -including our strong objections - has not been acknowledged or taken into account. This is deeplydisappointing.

As neighbours and members of this community, we are extremely saddened and frustrated by theproposal. The green space targeted for development is the only such area available to us locally. Itserves as a crucial communal area where our children play, residents meet, and everyone enjoysa small but vital connection to nature. Many of us chose to live here specifically because of thatgreen space, and the wellbeing it offers cannot be overstated.

We also question the legality of building on this green space. From our understanding, this landwas not originally intended to support further housing development. More appropriate brownfieldsites elsewhere in Bristol could be utilised to meet housing needs - without displacing green space

or impacting established communities so negatively.

Furthermore, this area is already experiencing heightened levels of crime and traffic congestion.Adding more housing - particularly without infrastructure improvements - would only exacerbatethese problems. Parking is already scarce, and additional pressure on local services could makethings worse for everyone currently living here.

The proposed development risks damaging the character, safety, and cohesion of ourneighbourhood. We feel strongly that our collective voice has not been heard, and we urge you toreconsider this proposal in light of the deep and genuine concerns from the local community.

We would appreciate a response confirming the timeline for further consultation, and clarificationon how community feedback is being factored into your decision-making process.

    on 2025-05-29   OBJECT

Commenter Type: Neighbour

Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application

Comment Reasons:

Comment:Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to formally object, in the strongest possible terms, to the proposed housing

development on Wootton Road.

As a resident of I have significant concerns regarding the proposed two-

bedroom bungalow in addition to broader concerns about the overall

development plan.

Concerns Regarding the Proposed Two-Bedroom Bungalow:

Firstly, I have not been personally consulted at and stage regarding the proposed bungalow,

despite its close proximity to my property. Given the potential impact, this lack of consultation is

deeply concerning.

From a structural standpoint, the construction raises concerns under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.

Excavations and groundwork for foundations could lead to ground movement, destabilization, and

potential subsidence, posing a risk to my property. Additionally, vibrations from heavy construction

work may result in cracks and structural damage. The area in question consists of largely

undeveloped land, and alterations to groundwater flow and moisture levels further increase the

risk of subsidence.

The irregular shape of the proposed bungalow-necessitated by the right of way behind it-suggests

it is being forced into a space that is insufficient. This is further supported by the plans attached to

the application, showing a very small box room as a second bedroom. The new bungalow on

plans also has a higher pitched roof than the adjoining bungalows, proposing not only an issue

with light but also with the new bungalow being in keeping with the current bungalows on this row.

Furthermore, the plans suggest that will maintain access "once the development is complete", and

that "safe access to properties will be maintained throughout the development process". However,

during the construction of a building so close to our home that we will have to walk very close to

the structure in progress itself, for access to our property, is inevitably going to cause huge

inconvenience getting to and from our vehicle with a new baby. It will also likely mean that a

significant amount of construction dust etc will affect our property and garden during this process

and with the limitations and proximity of access.

Quality of Life and Parking/Congestion Concerns:

The wider development raises serious concerns regarding the quality of life for existing residents.

Wootton Road is a quiet residential street that provides a tranquil environment for both residents

and local wildlife. The introduction of large-scale construction will significantly increase traffic,

noise,

and disruption. Following construction, the additional residents in a small area of the street with

vehicles will place further strain on an already overburdened parking system. I note that the

current plans include an attempt to encourage use of local transport and e-bikes etc. However, the

largely elderly population (evidenced by the significant amount of disabled bays) on the street will

not find access to bike storage and e-bikes/scooters suitable. Moreover, young families like

ourselves rely on vehicles specific to our jobs and to transport buggies etc. Therefore, although a

nice idea, with the No. 5 bus route being so poor, the alternative options are not going to make a

significant impact in the need for vehicles on the street, in my opinion. As a result, losing the car

park as well as only maintaining a little on-street parking (only put down as a possibility in the

plans) is going to cause huge issues on an already strained parking allocation (that regularly

causes neighbour disputes).

Again, due to the elderly population of the street, emergency services, particularly ambulances,

already struggle to navigate the road due to parking congestion. On numerous occasions, we have

had discussions with ambulance personnel who have expressed difficulties in accessing

properties with ill residents, often struggling to transport essential equipment to patients due to the

lack of clear access. Many residents of the bungalows, alongside the new bungalow proposed,

require frequent ambulance and medical intervention which may cause dangerous implications if

impeded by parking access and site access issues.

Without designated parking provisions for the new residents as well as alternative parking

provision to replace lost parking areas the impact on the residents of this road will be significant.

Conclusion:

In its current form, this development cannot be justified without addressing the serious concerns

regarding parking, road congestion, access concerns and structural risks to neighbouring

properties. The proposed bungalow, in particular, appears unnecessary and problematic due to its

forced irregular shape, potential to cause structural damage, and the significant disruption it will

create for my family.

The anticipation of the disruption of this

development and the resulting impact of overcrowding of the street and easy access to my

property, is already affecting my well-being.

I strongly urge the planning committee to reconsider this proposal.

Sincerely,

    on 2025-05-29   OBJECT

Commenter Type: Neighbour

Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application

Comment Reasons:

Comment:Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to formally object, in the strongest possible terms, to the proposed housing

development on Wootton Road.

I have significant concerns regarding the proposed two-

bedroom bungalow in addition to broader concerns about the overall

development plan.

Concerns Regarding the Proposed Two-Bedroom Bungalow:

Firstly, I have not been personally consulted at and stage regarding the proposed bungalow,

despite its close proximity to my property. Given the potential impact, this lack of consultation is

deeply concerning.

From a structural standpoint, the construction raises concerns under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.

Excavations and groundwork for foundations could lead to ground movement, destabilization, and

potential subsidence, posing a risk to my property. Additionally, vibrations from heavy construction

work may result in cracks and structural damage. The area in question consists of largely

undeveloped land, and alterations to groundwater flow and moisture levels further increase the

risk of subsidence.

The irregular shape of the proposed bungalow-necessitated by the right of way behind it-suggests

it is being forced into a space that is insufficient. This is further supported by the plans attached to

the application, showing a very small box room as a second bedroom. The new bungalow on

plans also has a higher pitched roof than the adjoining bungalows, proposing not only an issue

with light but also with the new bungalow being in keeping with the current bungalows on this row.

Furthermore, the plans suggest that will maintain access "once the development is complete", and

that "safe access to properties will be maintained throughout the development process". However,

during the construction of a building so close to our home that we will have to walk very close to

the structure in progress itself, for access to our property, is inevitably going to cause huge

inconvenience getting to and from our vehicle with a new baby. It will also likely mean that a

significant amount of construction dust etc will affect our property and garden during this process

and with the limitations and proximity of access.

Quality of Life and Parking/Congestion Concerns:

The wider development raises serious concerns regarding the quality of life for existing residents.

Wootton Road is a quiet residential street that provides a tranquil environment for both residents

and local wildlife. The introduction of large-scale construction will significantly increase traffic,

noise,

and disruption. Following construction, the additional residents in a small area of the street with

vehicles will place further strain on an already overburdened parking system. I note that the

current plans include an attempt to encourage use of local transport and e-bikes etc. However, the

largely elderly population (evidenced by the significant amount of disabled bays) on the street will

not find access to bike storage and e-bikes/scooters suitable. Moreover, young families like

ourselves rely on vehicles specific to our jobs and to transport buggies etc. Therefore, although a

nice idea, with the No. 5 bus route being so poor, the alternative options are not going to make a

significant impact in the need for vehicles on the street, in my opinion. As a result, losing the car

park as well as only maintaining a little on-street parking (only put down as a possibility in the

plans) is going to cause huge issues on an already strained parking allocation (that regularly

causes neighbour disputes).

Again, due to the elderly population of the street, emergency services, particularly ambulances,

already struggle to navigate the road due to parking congestion. On numerous occasions, we have

had discussions with ambulance personnel who have expressed difficulties in accessing

properties with ill residents, often struggling to transport essential equipment to patients due to the

lack of clear access. Many residents of the bungalows, alongside the new bungalow proposed,

require frequent ambulance and medical intervention which may cause dangerous implications if

impeded by parking access and site access issues.

Without designated parking provisions for the new residents as well as alternative parking

provision to replace lost parking areas the impact on the residents of this road will be significant.

Conclusion:

In its current form, this development cannot be justified without addressing the serious concerns

regarding parking, road congestion, access concerns and structural risks to neighbouring

properties. The proposed bungalow, in particular, appears unnecessary and problematic due to its

forced irregular shape, potential to cause structural damage, and the significant disruption it will

create for my family.

The anticipation of the disruption of this

development and the resulting impact of overcrowding of the street and easy access to my

property, is already affecting my well-being.

I strongly urge the planning committee to reconsider this proposal.

Sincerely,